Far Cry VS Crysis


A Short video showing some of the similarities of both games. Check the linked video for an update on Crysis VS FarCRY 2

Related Blogs


This entry was posted on Friday, July 30th, 2010 at 7:08 pm and is filed under Crysis. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

25 Responses to “Far Cry VS Crysis”

  1. Crysis 5x better than Far Cry and swimming style is the main that made me have this opinion.

  2. @yojoinman farcy was published by ubisoft and made by the ubisoft Montreal team and crysis was made by crytek amd published by EA… why do people try and be clever

  3. crysis is more best than far cry xDDD

  4. legolover123321 on July 30th, 2010 at 9:38 pm

    Far Cry: Crysis on low

  5. @EvilLamas graphic whore?

  6. xControleFreaKx on July 30th, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    hahahaha this far cry its a shit why you dont do far cry 2 vs crysis??

  7. Far cry one Still has Really nice graphics and always will

  8. @yojoinman it was PUBLISHED by EA, but Ubisoft made it really..

  9. what’s the newest crysis, i dont really know these games but they look awesom

  10. graphics-crysis
    gameplay-far cry

  11. far cry ftw

  12. LowUploadRate on July 31st, 2010 at 2:24 am

    yea crysis have a loot of good graphics things, but you need a 2 gcards(both with 2 cards inside) in sli = 4 sli cards to run the game at 30-80 fps in very hig with a large screen, a monster PC to view the beauty of the game, and i think the graphics isnt the reason too need such a PowerPC, i think, is the game needs a loot of optimisations to be a realy good game because far cry 2(don’t have the crysis total = grafics)but run more faster ,have a similar look and dont need such a PC

  13. HuangQiaoqiao on July 31st, 2010 at 3:14 am

    @bluetoaster8822 texture paste in pc and console vary alot, estimate over 4 gb of texture unit is rendered in 1 frame on pc, while only 800mb of texture unit is rendered on console, pc version have higer grade of HDR natively supported by the new GTX470/480, it is also capabable of having extreame high anti alising, phsic process and editing mode which i belive, is the uniqness differ crysis from any other game

  14. I prefere the green ness of far cry :D

  15. IAmMoreGoodThanYou on July 31st, 2010 at 4:19 am

    both by crytek.
    both surpassing relative to there release date :)

  16. MetatroN197924 on July 31st, 2010 at 4:49 am

    consoles cannot produce far cry 1 on 60fps 720p.the crysis is a dream for consoles that cannot reach.

  17. bluetoaster8822 on July 31st, 2010 at 5:05 am

    Well, unfortunately they’re making Crysis 2 multi-platform (PC/PS3/X360), and as a result the graphics look the exact same as Crysis 1. :(

    We’re probably gonna be seeing this a lot in the coming years, PC titles having toned-down graphics because of being multi-platform.

  18. This proves that Pc has had better graphics for years but people who play the console say that pc is stupid and dumb and has shit graphics while the pc already has games that could not perform on the ps3 or xbox 360.

  19. crysis is still the best graphiced game on the market after 3 years! Far cry was overtaken by doom 3…

  20. @52562562562 farcry 3 gonna use the new cryengine 3, cool cause in cryengine 3, smoke will be rendered like particles realtime

  21. ofcourse Crysis!!!

  22. far cry looks realy good when you think better (how old it is)…

  23. Crysis – cryengine 2, came from far cry – cryengine 1. So it really wouldn’t be a which has more realistic or impressive graphics video.

  24. Why CryEngine 3?… CryEngine 2 is better..

  25. this is not fair. far cry is older then crysis. you have to compare it with farcry 2.

Leave a Reply